Thank you Elizabeth May, Leader of the Green Party of Canada, for revealing to us who your real masters are. You always said you would “speak truth to power, no matter how unpopular or politically incorrect”. I believed you. But you have fallen from grace. Certain topics cause you to abandon logic and reason, and you exhibit a Pavlovian response.

What follows are portions of an email exchange which was cc’ed and bcc’ed to a number of people. It began with my brief agreement with Fay Ash who encouraged Elizabeth May and the Green Party to revisit climate policies such as the carbon tax, and to take a close look at media censorship and whose interests were being served with what agenda.

On Dec 30, 2016, at 10:01 PM, Elizabeth May  wrote:

Denial of Holocaust and denial of climate change science are manifestly unacceptable — deeply abhorrent. Facts, history and reality are against your views. Time is of the essence. You stand against science, our obligations to history and to future generations.

Elizabeth

The background to the “Holocaust” reference is the Green Party press release last July which followed their discovery of my apparently heretical “Sorry Mom, I was wrong about the Holocaust” video. It should be noted that I had already rescinded my membership after Elizabeth May refused to acknowledge that there was a problem with the official 9/11 story, by distancing herself from the petition which she tabled in the House of Commons.

mayshocked

Here is what I wrote on January 1st, 2017.

Dear Elizabeth May,

Why do you avoid talking about geoengineering? Why does the Green Party not address the spraying of chemicals in our skies? I am quite certain that chemtrails cause climate change. I am no longer certain about the CO2 factor. But there is no doubt that we are putting many toxins and pollutants into our environment and that we should work to clean up our act.

As for the holohoax, I used to believe the victor’s version of history too, the one that Hollywood has successfully hard-wired into peoples’ minds with their endless movies depicting those evil Germans. I am glad that I have begun to learn the truth about these matters.

It is rather strange how the courts have been using the Doctrine of Judicial Notice ever since the Nuremberg trials did so with their Articles 19 and 21. Since you are a lawyer, I am sure you know what that doctrine is. For those on the cc and bcc list, the Doctrine of Judicial Notice allows courts to recognize as fact matters that are “common knowledge”. In other words, evidence is not required when an event is deemed to be self-evident. They simply said “The Holocaust” happened, so they did not need to show evidence that it happened. Does that not constitute reverse and perverse logic?

In case you wish to disabuse yourself of the toxic lies, here is a documentary called “Questioning the Holocaust – why we believed”.

There is very much excellent resource material readily available on the internet now in the year 2017. It is wonderful that the lies are crumbling.

in Truth and Peace,
Monika Schaefer

I will include here a response by David Crowe, former Chief Financial Officer of the Alberta Green Party, to Elizabeth May’s brief email. He wrote on December 30.

Dear Elizabeth;

I agree that total denial of a problem is a problem. But questioning of a widely accepted assertion is not a problem, it is not denial, it is actually a good thing. There are no facts in science, there are only working hypotheses. Remember, it’s still the “theory of evolution”, not the “fact of evolution”, even thought most scientists accept it (including myself). Those who have questions about climate change, including myself, should not be demonized. Does fear of climate change justify geo-engineering? Using energy to pump CO2 into the ground? Nuclear power? Plantations of trees at the expense of natives who lived there? Financial instruments that might be used to rip off the taxpayer? Suppression of scientists who don’t toe the party line? Ignoring the adverse effects of alternative energy, such as bird deaths from windmills?

And, although I fully accept that the Nazis killed millions of Jews, I am uncomfortable with the ongoing use of the holocaust to justify current Israeli government policies.

Take evolution, for example, which is perhaps less politically charged right now. I don’t support the teaching of evolution at the expense of teaching religious theories of creation. I think both should be “described” and students should be required to think about how the evidence matches the various theories. As someone who studied evolutionary science for several years I’m confident that most students will, if given the chance, agree that species are fluid, and change over time (i.e. they evolve). But the critics will be the people who keep us honest, even when the critics are wrong. I learned a lot from having a few fundamentalists in classes discussing evolutionary biology. I didn’t agree with them, but it forced me to clarify my positions. Should I have lobbied to throw them out of my classes? Furthermore, there is a lot of circular reasoning in evolutionary science, and those who believe in evolution sometimes have to have the humility to accept that we don’t know everything. As Stephen Jay Gould pointed out, we actually don’t know how horses and giraffes evolve because much of what was put in textbooks to “teach” evolution was false. In our zeal to turn myth into fact we sometimes end up promulgating falsehoods.

If we suppressed critics of evolution totally we wouldn’t have the science of epigenetics (i.e. Lamarck was a little bit right, despite what most textbooks used to say). And eugenics would probably still be an accepted concept (because it’s based on a simplistic, absolutist understanding of evolution).

Regards,
David Crowe

On January 2nd, 2017, Elizabeth May responds:

Monika,

It pains me to say it, but it must be said clearly and unequivocally. Your decision to deny the reality of the murder of 6 million Jews places you in a realm beyond the pale. I cannot engage with you other than to suggest you seek counseling.

I will not reply to your messages again.

Elizabeth

Really? 6 Million? I need to seek counselling? Well, I view this last message from E.May as a gift. She reveals her allegiance and subservience to the Zionist masters. Either that or she is willfully blind, or a coward. It is like she is running back into the burning house. The lies are done. The house of cards is falling down.

Here was my same-day response to her.

Dear Elizabeth,

The Bolsheviks threw many political dissidents into insane asylums because they did not want people to think and speak clearly. They also murdered tens of millions of Russians. The same Cabal was behind that “revolution” as is in control of our countries in the West.

You specifically mention the murdered 6 million Jews. They subtracted almost 3 million from the official numbers at Auschwitz, and yet the magic 6 million remains the same.

Why can you not answer my questions? Instead you tell me to seek counselling and are cutting off further communication. The people on my bcc list might find this amusing, other than the fact that we find ourselves in an extremely perilous situation. We face an existential threat.

You, Elizabeth May, Leader of the Green Party of Canada, are proving yourself to be a mere puppet to the Hidden Government.

Here is one more offering, for your edification. Benjamin Freedman’s speech of 1961 is worth paying attention to. He was a Jew who knew, and he was telling the world. Why do we not pay heed?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HhFRGDyX48c
If you prefer to read the transcript of the speech, it is here: http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/israel/freedman.htm

In Truth and Hope,
Monika

Advertisements