Two months ago I published on my blog the letter I received from the Green Party of Alberta. What follows is my response.
November 5, 2016
To the Green Party of Alberta
RE: My expulsion from the GPA as noted in your registered letter to me, dated August 19, 2016
Your registered letter arrived more than 2 months ago, so please forgive my tardiness replying. I have been rather busy with my work, however I still feel it is important to respond. First let me assure you that it is of no consequence to me that you have terminated my membership in the Green Party of Alberta, as I have no interest in working in this political party anymore. It has become abundantly clear to me that the Green Parties both provincially and federally are very compromised, as nobody in the upper echelons of those parties can even talk about 9/11. That is much more recent and it is much easier to disentangle ourselves from that false-flag deception than the holohoax. The Green Parties seem to be controlled by the same hidden hand of power that controls the other mainstream parties.
I have replicated your letter below in quotes, and my answers follow each point. I do hope that you will do some investigation, and not simply dismiss my answers outright. We have all been indoctrinated all our lives. I also believed all the lies about WWII history until a few short years ago. It was not easy coming out of the mind-contaminated state, but it is much better to come out on the side of truth than to remain in the fog of deception, where there is no hope for a peaceful and decent future. My motivation is love, and a profound desire for peace.
Dear Ms. Schaefer,
The Executive Committee of the Green Party of Alberta has reviewed the video you recently posted on YouTube in which you claim that the attempted extermination of European Jews by Nazi Germany (the Holocaust) was a hoax. The Committee’s response to this is as follows:
(1) The extermination program, in which approximately six million Jews were murdered, is historical fact and is supported by massive evidence, including the testimonies of survivors and German perpetrators and documentary evidence from contemporary German sources. To maintain otherwise requires a determined effort of willful blindness. A suggestion: check the Wikipedia entry for Rudolf Höss.
You speak of “massive evidence”. Why then are there laws prohibiting debate or questioning of this event in so many countries including Canada? The evidence should speak for itself. What other historical event has laws prohibiting discussion?
Why was the prosecutor during the historic Ernst Zundel trials unable to produce this “massive evidence” of which you speak?
This 6 million number – how do you account for the official Auschwitz museum curators subtracting almost 3 million, and yet the 6 million remains? How do you account for the ever-changing official historiography since WWII? Continue reading