Open Letter to Canadian Government RE: CBSA Modern-day Book Burning

I spent a few hours putting together a comprehensive list of all 338 Canadian Members of Parliament E-mail addresses, as well as over 100 Senators (the house of sober second thought), and sent them the following open letter on 2020 January 16. For background to this story, please see my last article from September 2019 here, and within that article are links to earlier articles about this Orwellian saga.


RE: Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) theft of privately owned books at Calgary Airport


On 24 April 2019 upon my return from the USA to Calgary airport, five books were seized / stolen from me by the Canada Border Services Agency. I had been flagged, and was harassed and detained for three hours.

I wrote three letters, May 3rd, July 2nd, August 12th, 2019 plus an appeal October 18, 2019 to the CBSA, in an effort to get my books back.

Two out of five books were returned to me, and the others were deemed to constitute “hate propaganda”, prohibited under Customs tariff item 9899.00.00 pursuant to section 58 of the Customs Act.

The 3 books which are still in the possession of the CBSA are:

  • The Commission   by Richard Barrett
  • The Great Impersonation – The Mask of Edom   by Pastor Eli James
  • Mystery Babylon: New World Unveiled Vol. 1  by Eli James and Clay Douglas

The explanatory form that was sent to me had the following boxes checked off, indicating what the so-called “offence” was:

Alleging that an identifiable group:

    • is to blame for serious economic or social problems
    • manipulates media/trade/finance/politics/government to the detriment of society
    • is inferior/superior
    • weakens or threatens society

There was no indication that it mattered or not whether these forbidden allegations were grounded in truth. Truth is not relevant here. It only matters that certain things (the Truth?) are not allowed to be said or read.

Ultimately I was supposed to PROVE that the stolen books were NOT “hate” by providing evidence that they were not hate. The absurdity of the entire debacle reached a level not possible in a sane society. Allow me to quote from my third letter to the CBSA dated August 12, 2019.

First, the deadline for rebuttal is impossible to meet. Your letter, dated July 16, 2019, took 9 days to reach me.[…] Your letter stipulated that you must receive, by mail, my evidence and arguments within 14 days of the date on your letter[…]. If my letter took as long to reach you as yours to reach me, it would already have been too late, and would have allowed a negative amount of time for me to, in your words, ‘submit evidence, regarding the admissibility of the material […]’.

The more serious matter is that the onus of proof is reversed. You say I should provide evidence that these books do not constitute “hate propaganda”. If something does not exist, it is a moot point to prove it does not exist. If it does exist, then the person alleging that it exists should prove that it exists. The onus MUST be on the accuser to prove their accusation. Your logic is false.

The next flaw in your case against me is that you have stolen the evidence! You have taken away […] the books that you deemed offensive. How am I supposed to gather and submit evidence regarding the “admissibility of the material” when you have taken the allegedly-offensive books away from me???

I have not read the books. I do not have copies of these books in my possession. You seized them. Explain to me how I am to gather evidence about an object that you have stolen from me.  Would these books not be the very source of “evidence” with which I am supposed to prove that they are NOT something that you allege they are?

As any logical-thinking man or woman can see, it is an impossible situation. It is as sensible as breaking both legs of a runner and then telling him to go win that race. Would that be a fair race? Or is the outcome pre-determined.

I could avail myself of what appears to be the only option remaining, that of litigation against the CBSA. However, it is not worth my time and resources to participate in this game, a totally rigged system, to get my books back. I do not wish to feed the proverbial beast.

It would of course only be done on principle, as the books are worth far less money than the time and resources it would cost to litigate. As for winning, truth and righteousness are on my side, but the entire so-called justice system is so corrupted that my chances of success are about as good as the runner with the two broken legs winning his race.

The Canada Border Services Agency is de facto an arm of the government. It is at best a sign of moral and ethical bankruptcy and at worst it is treachery and treason for you, as so-called government representatives, to engage in such tyranny against the people who you are supposed to be serving. The government no longer serves the people, but is serving an enemy within.

It is interesting to note that the Talmud has not been stipulated as “hate propaganda”, yet this Jewish holy book calls the Gentiles cattle and calls for our total enslavement. This double standard on which books are “permitted”, demonstrates who you are really serving. Your “Act” which prohibits certain books (and thoughts and spoken words) is a modern day book burning.

I challenge every and any one of you government representatives to rectify this situation. Get rid of the “thought and speech laws”. Have my stolen books returned to me.

In the meantime, I can and have replaced the books through other channels. I am sovereign of my domain and can decide what I can and want to read or not.

I am compelled to publicize widely, this Orwellian act of treachery by an agency which represents Canada at our borders. We truly are living in interesting times.

Monika Schaefer

“When the Germans Invaded Czechoslovakia” open letter by Herta Ruthard

January 2019

“When the Germans Invaded Czechoslovakia” – Hearing this slanderous and hateful remark on my favourite “New Classical FM” in a commercial for the Blue Mountain Winter Sport Resort in Collingwood during the Christmas season, when people all over the world celebrate peace and joy, spoiled this holy time for me tremendously and came as a personal insult because I was born in 1931 in just this area in question. I thought I am calloused enough to be immune against this sort of German-bashing but all of a sudden my 87-year-old heart was aching and rebelling , urging me to fight back. It was the last straw and I will tell you who the real invaders were.

Sudetia, my homeland: since 300 before Christ this area had been Germanic settlement territory. For two thousand three hundred years, it was ours. Later, Czechs INVADED Sudetenland and soon subjugated the native Germans with the intent to wipe them out because the Czechs wanted the land for themselves. The living conditions were catastrophic: unemployment, no food, (babies were given black malt coffee instead of milk), no clothing, no medical care. There was a Czech doctor, Dr Stransky in Reichenberg, my hometown, who gave Germans seeking help the cynical advice:

the best for you is to throw yourself into the Neisse

(river running through Reichenberg), or

have you tried this?

~ and he motioned hanging.

I heard this from my mother – never to forget it. And when this genocide was reported abroad, silence was the answer. Then, in 1938, Hitler came to our rescue. He did not come as an invader, he came as our saviour. I owe him my survival. That was the “Sudetenland-Anschluss”.

After that, we Sudeten-Germans held out our hands to our enemies for reconciliation. The Czechs took these hands, worked for the victory of the Reich and were more German than the Germans themselves, so that they were soon entrusted with the most confidential tasks.

Then, in 1945, came Germany’s defeat and with it the Czech authorities’ fear of the consequences of their collaboration with Hitler-Germany. This fear turned into an unbelievable incitement against all things German, put the Czechs into a blood frenzy of an indescribable extent and started one of the greatest tragedies in all of human history. Documented in the book “Das andere Lidice” by Erich Kern.

Friedrich Smetana, a great son of Bohemia, would turn over in his grave if he heard what his beloved Moldau had to tell after May 1945. During his lifetime this river inspired him with its calming murmur or angry shouting for his world-famous symphony “Die Moldau“. Think about it when you play it for your listeners!

460,000 Sudeten-Germans were murdered in the most bestial manner, the rest of 3.5 million were driven out and the Czechs found themselves again in possession of the stolen Sudetenland and called it Czechoslovakia. Czech President Benes over the radio: “Take everything away from the Germans, leave them only a handkerchief to weep into!”

Smashed Germany took us in when she was carpet-bombed into rubble, Sudetenland was spared for the Czechs, and with us refugees Germany experienced her “economic miracle”. 

From 1946 on I grew new roots, strong and healthy, in the German soil. When my husband decided to go to Canada in 1972/74, I uprooted myself to go with him. He gave up a very well-paying job at IBM as a customer technician to go to the land of his dreams. Canada opened her border for us but not her heart. Not for a German, who has to forget his pride and honour and has to accept living under the lie and being a third-class citizen. It saddened me to my soul when I had to watch how he buried his dream, and it pained me for not being able to root in this anti-German Canadian soil. Canada failed her Germans miserably. All of them. Why?


The victor still writes the history of the vanquished.
The slayer disfigures the face of the slain.
The weaker leaves the world, and what remains is the lie.

~ Bertold Brecht (1898-1956, world-famous German poet)

Exactly this is what happened with Germany, she was slain, her face disfigured, and the lie stayed behind. That is why the hate goes on and on. Germany still has no peace treaty, still under the control of the US government.

It was a big mistake to emigrate to an enemy country, where my husband was greeted with Heil Hitler on his first day of work at Litton Systems Canada. Where society confronted our little 8-year old daughter with unconditional hatred after the film “Holocaust” was broadcast on TV. She lost her school friends overnight, was called a “Nazi”, and swastikas were smeared onto her desk. 

After 1945, the Allied-licensed media imposed on Germany was ordered to never ever report anything positive about the Germans or anything negative about the Allies. Needless to say, the same applies to the victorious nations to this day, and it will continue to apply tomorrow. 

Always remember: either distortion, selective negativity, condemnation, hatred, lies or nothing at all. And the people have been conditioned to it all their lives. 

The result was in the long run a people, deprived of its true great history, and consumed by self-hate and self-destruction. See the picture of these two young German women. 

Screen Shot 2019-12-28 at 8.22.15 AM

“Invaded by the Germans”

Poor little Poland suffered the same fate, didn’t she? Encouraged by the British she butchered her German minorities and then declared war on Germany, and THEN the Wehrmacht was ordered to attack on September 1, 1939. In a short speech Hitler said:

Now we are shooting back.

“Hiding from the Nazis”

I wonder what the next idea will be. My question is: what kind of message are you directing at your German-Canadian listeners? Filling your quota of anti-Germanism? These people are bad (see the preacher Billy Sunday) but their music is good and can be used for a crazy world. Crazy indeed: Too bad it can’t also be blamed on us “Nazis” too. 

What we see now is the beginning of the end of the White Race worldwide. 

“The weaker leaves the world and what remains is …” the Mix.

Herta Ruthard

Letter from Gerard Menuhin

The following letter came to me just over a month ago (15 November 2019), and when I asked permission to publish it Gerard Menuhin said yes of course,


I  just found a thread and went on writing.


It just so happens that Gerard Menuhin stars in the story that led to my last article, since it was the review about his book Tell the Truth and Shame the Devil which Sonja Dickey had found so offensive, and ultimately led to her refusal to provide copy service to me.



Dear Monika,


As I had noted Alfred’s court appearance on the 12th, but hadn’t heard anything about it, I looked him up and found your site with all your latest experiences.


It’s good to read about how active you have been. Also the regular persecution you fearlessly face, from people too dumb to think for themselves.


I’ve never been to Canada, except for a transit once at an airport many years go. Obviously, there is a connection between the two enormous captured domains of Canada and Australia in that both were parts of ‘the Commonwealth’. Assuming that all colonization and exploration, leading to domination, was a quest for local riches and cost money, it surely isn’t stretching a point to suppose that the backers of such ventures were always the same.


It’s probably not an exaggeration to assume the same of the Dutch West Indies and of the French overseas colonies. Again, who funded Spain’s excursions to South America and Portugal’s to Macao, etc.? All leading to ‘empires’, something for the ruling countries’ populations to be proud of, while their under-privileged slaved away in the factories of the industrial revolution.


Then, one by one, these ‘dominions’ were relinquished by their colonizers, leaving behind multi-nationals to continue to plunder the land, and huge numbers of natives, eager to migrate to the home countries of their former rulers, whose languages they often spoke and whose governments were incapable or unwilling to stop this migration. (Australia and Canada were exceptions, as their native populations had been largely wiped out, as was that of the U.S.)


Political control occurred simultaneously with the theft of natural resources. In much of Africa,  it sufficed to bribe a local tribe leader. In South Africa, the Boers had to be wiped out. In the more sophisticated countries of Western Europe, governments and populations had to be undermined by subtler policies, always based on the financial incentives of their respective central banks. These incentives led to immensely profitable world wars.


The largest and most important colony was not dominated by another nation, but by criminal infiltrators, under the flag of a false ideology. After about 70 years, this ideology lost its local magnetism, or was abandoned at about the same time as the rest of the captured world had submitted to financial domination. No coincidence. Its threat was no longer needed, as its driving force continues to subvert the entire world.


Now, through the degradation of all culture, traditions and education, and with the help of captive media and propaganda or lies, almost all the targets have been reached. Regional wars have provided the incentive for migrants to flood ‘democracies’ which already cannot afford to maintain their standards. So control is almost complete.


Is a Third World War really necessary? The doomsday weapons have been invented and are ready. As capability dictates policy, they may be used. Will the destruction of air and water occur within our lifetimes? Only those whose will has determined the planet’s unfortunate evolution know this. Their constitution is rooted in destruction, so they have no alternative.


Basically, the dilemma derives from the difference between natural and unnatural. Being attached to the soil (“bodenständig”) versus eternally floating above it. The enemy understands our human weaknesses, including perhaps above all, our superstition. These weaknesses are used against us. Responsible humans don’t need to worship anything or anyone. They need only to respect nature. Nature should be our only ‘God’.


Our only salvation rests in ourselves and in our respect for nature. The millions of illiterates and otherwise uneducated who have never learnt to use their minds are lost. They cannot be awakened, as you have discovered. The effort is too great.


But these thoughts are only mine, they need not distract you from your own mission.


Let’s hope for the best for Alfred.


Best wishes,

Trivial Trespass Trial

There were to be two trials held on 12 December 2019 in Jasper where Monika Schaefer (this author) had being charged. The first matter came under the Criminal Code of Canada (CC) “causing a disturbance”, and the second was for a voluntary payment violation ticket for trespassing, which we opted to contest.

As seems to be common, the court list was very long. Court began at 10 am, the public gallery was full, and down the list they went. It was just after 4 pm when my name was finally called. Frank Frost, my representative, and I stepped forward. I half expected them to reschedule both matters. However the judge explained that both matters could not be tried on the same day, as one was federal and the other provincial, and so it was suggested we go ahead with the provincial matter. Both sides agreed. Thirty minutes had originally been scheduled for the trespassing charge, whereas two hours had been set for the CC charge.

Judge Shaigec apologized to Mychol Ormandy, the complainant of the disturbance charge, for having had to spend all day for naught. Ormandy and his witnesses were formally dismissed, but were free to remain as spectators – which they did.

A prosecution team of two, Mr. Rankin, and Ms. Van Tighem, were handling my cases together, Mr. Rankin speaking on this charge.

The whole case against me came down to the prosecutor’s argument that I did not leave the 3 Sheets shop quickly enough when asked to leave by the owner Sonja Dickey. Was it 2 minutes or was it 5 minutes?

The brief story is that I had been refused service once back in 2017, because Sonja did not like the material that I was photocopying. She did not want to serve someone “who hates”. Subsequent visits to the shop were friendly. Fast forward to January 31, 2019, not only was I refused service, but was told to leave. A few days later there was a telephone conversation with an RCMP member, that was all. He explained about trespassing. There were no charges, no investigation, no statement, no further action. Then on July 3rd I went back to that shop again, because I needed to quickly copy a price list for the fruit vendor for whom I was working, and other options were not immediately available. That visit did not go well and resulted in the trespass violation ticket being handed to me six weeks later. 

A more detailed history of this story can be read in this article from 31 January 2019, and in the more recent update here.

Sonja took the stand first, and testified to the fact that she had not wanted to serve me after reading what I was copying, the book review of Gerard Menuhin’s book Tell the Truth and Shame the Devil. She said with gravity how Gerard Menuhin was the disgraced son of the famous Jewish violinist Yehudi Menuhin, and that Gerard Menuhin…

…denied the holocaust!!

After being asked the question by Mr. Frost whether she said she did not wish to serve someone “who hates”, she said yes she had said something to that effect.

When asked how long I had stayed in the shop, Sonja answered approximately 5 minutes. In my own testimony I had said I thought it was shorter than that, perhaps 2 or 3 minutes but nobody had a stop-watch. It was an estimation.

In answer to questions, I recounted my experiences in the 3 Sheets shop in great detail, including the early days in 2015 when Sonja first opened the shop, how supportive I was of her small family business.

The prosecutor asked many questions of me, and went on at length asking how long I stayed after being asked to leave, both on January 31st and on July 3rd. He went on and on about the time, was it 2 minutes, 3 minutes, 5 minutes, and why did I stay at all after being asked to leave. I conceded that “I probably stayed longer than she wanted”, and he asked how did I know that. I replied that I reached that conclusion by the fact that she later called the police.

Great issue was made by Rankin with respect to my uttering a swear word not just once but three times in the shop. Sonja had said I called her “f***ing ridiculous, but I assured the court that I was talking about the situation. “It was f***ing ridiculous!” And so it was!

The prosecutor tried to make my testimony look shaky by taking issue with my phrase “In my recollection…” with which I began some of my answers. I assured him that I was answering all his questions to the best of my ability. I had, after all, reread my relevant journal entries before attending court.

Later I thought of a better answer that I wish I had given (isn’t that the way it goes…). But no matter, it was probably already clear to the judge that by definition, every single time we are answering a question about the past, we are, by definition, “recalling” events. The equivalent noun is “recollection”. Therefore it is completely accurate to say that we are recalling the past when we speak of the past. The phrase “in my recollection” does not impute judgement of how strong or weak or accurate or inaccurate the recollection is.

The most interesting part of the trial came when the prosecutor was giving his final statement. Judge Shaigec interrupted Mr. Rankin almost immediately to clarify the Trespass Act, and then the sparring match began!

The judge spoke of prior “notice” being required in order for a trespass to have occurred. I did, after all, leave peacefully and without having to be physically forced. 2 minutes or 5 minutes – is that what we were arguing here?

If I did not receive either written or verbal notice that I was not welcome in future to enter the shop, then I could not be expected to know that there was a life-long ban on me entering the shop. 

The prosecutor was forced to concede that the January 31st incident had no bearing on the July 3rd incident. If that was the case, then why were we bickering about the 2 or 5 minute delay in my vacating the shop?

Rankin kept going, kept making arguments to the judge, and the judge kept on explaining things to him. It was as though we were witnessing school – a law class – where the student and professor were discussing how the law works. Rankin was clearly grasping at straws, and simply did not want to let it go!

Frank Frost was given the last word, and by this time, not much needed be said. My favourite line of the day was,

Well, I think the Prosecution made our case for us…

He added that this was nothing but a witch hunt.

There were many long faces in the public gallery when at the end of this nearly two hour(!) trial the judge pronounced the verdict NOT GUILTY.

For those people in Jasper who were mocking me about these upcoming trials, who were fully expecting this to be a slam-dunk conviction, this verdict will perhaps give them something to think about, perhaps also a little humility.

Letter from Alfred October 2019

Please note: Much has transpired in the relatively short time since this letter from Alfred was written. 2019/11/22/alfred-moving/ and /2019/11/17/update-on-alfred, on his latest trial and on his move to a different prison.



Dear Monika,

just got your letter from Oct 12 and your new address. I love the honour that my dear Pawlow gets. He’s such a wonderful companion and quite the jumper. Am I ever glad that I sent my telepathic line check out because now it would be too late. They would say the results have been fudged. Monika, no matter what short term inconveniences they may throw at us, they are conceding defeat. They are not the monolithic entity they like us to believe they are, and more and more of “them” are helping us. Since living in this fine guest house, I have been given 4 Jack Pot Lottery wins. No shit. I may have written you this already, but I’m so happy, I’ll say it again.

1) Thomas #1
2) Möne’s NY Speech
3) “Worst Case” 8.8.2019 Article
4) Thomas #2

All these things, they are beyond magic, they are gifts of God. I won’t delve into #1 & #4 too much right now, because “one should never touch running machine”. That’s an old Indian IBM saying.

What does all that tell us? Easy. We need to increase the pressure and step on it, full throttle. They keep helping us, but we must not slack off. The big vomit is coming. Believe me, that is why we are getting very good help, because the “insiders” want to be able to have on record: “Look, I helped you here, or here.” Of course, us being honourable people, we will not chop their head off if we are satisfied that what they present is, in fact, valid. Continue reading

Alfred Moving… updated

….  out of jail?

Unfortunately no, not out of jail. But he is being moved to a different jail – Landsberg am Lech. I will confirm this in a few days (see below), but this is the word from yesterday (November 21st), his third and last court date for the latest trial – the trial for speaking forbidden words in his defence in the courtroom, and for making forbidden gestures in the courtroom.

Related articles – the August sentencing, and the update last week.

The 18 month additional sentence for speaking in court turned into an 8 month sentencenot what the prosecutor asked for (24 months!!)! Are the winds changing?

Here is a link to a 10 minute video by Spiegel TV in Germany entitled “The bizarre World of Holocaust Deniers”. It is from 20 November 2019, one day before Alfred’s verdict, and makes no mention of his current trial. That would have raised too many questions for ordinary thinking people – the fact that someone can be jailed simply for speaking in court, let alone for speaking at all.

They try to tell us how “freedom of speech” is supposedly being “used / abused” by “Nazis” to “falsify history”. Everything on its head! There is some nice footage from the 2018 Schaefer Sibling trial. Ursula Haverbeck also stars in this video, before she went to jail in 2018. Sylvia Stolz and the Volkslehrer (people’s-teacher) and many other Patriots appear. There is of course a “holocaust survivor” in there too.

If someone would like to give us some translation (or a summary) of the above video, feel free to put it into the comments under this article.

For now I just wanted to get the word out there about the latest development: Alfred has received an 8 month sentence to be added to the 38 month sentence given in October 2018. That is just short of 4 years jail time for speaking truth. 

Truth is Hate for those who Hate the Truth.

*****UPDATE 24 November 2019: Alfred has been moved to Landsberg am Lech. Here is his address:

Alfred Schaefer
Hindenburgring 12
86899 Landsberg am Lech

Update on Alfred


The Prosecutor’s appeal for MORE jail time for Alfred speaking in court and showing how high his dog Pavlov can jump has not yet reached its conclusion. There were two days of court this past week, 2019 November 12 and 14. Alfred had begun his Last Word, but was not finished speaking. The Last Word is the one remaining “right” that the accused has in the German court. The accused may speak as long as he likes, unless it is deemed irrelevant.

Highlights (or Lowlights):

(Very brief notes, taken by memory at the end of the day by a member of the public and passed on to Henry Hafenmayer, posted in German here.)

  • Alfred’s appeal – of the guilty verdict (38 month jail sentence plus court costs) for “speech crimes”, handed down 26 October 2018 culminating the Schaefer Sibling trial –  has been dismissed.
  • All paper and pens / pencils were confiscated from the public before entering the courtroom. This happened during our trial of 2018, but after a day or so this had been overruled. Not so this time. The prohibition on writing materials lasted both days. The public was NOT permitted to take any notes. 
  • Alfred started out facetiously stating that he would not open his mouth in court, because every word he spoke was turned upside down on him.
  • Alfred asked questions of the witnesses: a bureaucrat, one of the judges, and the prosecutor from the 2018 trial. The bureaucrat was asked if she had an indoctrinated fear causing shock with regards to the “Hitler salute”. Alfred asked the prosecutor if she was familiar with the game Musical Chairs. She has been in the prosecutor’s chair, now she is in the witness chair. Could she imagine one day being in the accused chair?
  • Addressing the court: Alfred asked what or whom specifically did he incite.

I am an engineer, and engineers need to name, define, work things very concretely otherwise you are thrown out onto the street.

  • The prosecutor asked Alfred if murderers called him when they want to do a murder. A gasp went through the gallery. Prosecutor continued, are your followers leftists or rightwing?
  • Prosecutor’s Plaedoyer: Alfred is a very dangerous anti-semite and jew-hater, and he should receive 5 years jail time (put together for the various “crimes”).

Alfred’s Last Word

  • The presiding judge interrupted and warned that Alfred was doing new “speech crime” by denying the holocaust, and that new charges could be laid. This could be the perpetual “merry-go-round” – do a speech crime, go to jail, go to court, new speech crime in court, more jail, appeal, new speech crime in court, more jail, appeal again and on and on and on.
  • Within the first two hours of Day 2, three different people took the prosecutor’s chair. Musical chairs. Ho hum just another day on the job.
  • After the judge warned Alfred he was getting off topic (bringing up other lies such as moon landing and the global warming scam) and that his Last Word could be withdrawn, Alfred spoke about a burning house. If you see that a house is on fire and you are aware of the presence of children inside, you have two choices. You could walk away and pretend not to notice, or you could rescue the children, with the full knowledge that your life could be at risk in so doing. His job is to rescue the children, just as it is his job to rescue the people from the dangers of the Lies.
  • In jail, many prisoners are having fun raising their right arm. Some boast how high their dogs can jump, others indicate how high the snow drifts are in front of their doors.
  • Alfred read some letters, including one from this author, and another from a jewish man who thanked Alfred for having protected him from being mobbed. This negates the prosecutor’s allegation that Alfred is a dangerous jew-hater. 

Court will resume 2019 November 21.

A reminder to the reader: Letters or cards are always appreciated. Alfred’s address is Stadelheimer Str 12, 81549 Munich, Germany. More information on writing to political prisoners in Germany in this article.

Speaking Tour One Year Out


Mt. Rainier

One year out after being ejected from the German Gulag, I just completed a short speaking tour, visiting and meeting interesting and wonderful people.

A dinner engagement at a twelve person table was hosted by Paul and Pamela Viminitz on October 25th, 2019 in Lethbridge Alberta. Most of the guests were “normies”, people who had not YET had their eyes opened to the truth about history and current events, still hypnotized by the lies and deceptions of mainstream media, Hollywood, and modern “educational” institutions. They call their dinner series “Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner” events, and I was this month’s “Guest of Dishonour”. Truly, that is how I was introduced, in jest of course.

The rules are simple: small talk, get to know one another until the dinner dishes are cleared away, then the real discussion can begin. We talked about the 2018 speech crime trial, and everything and anything relating to that.

From there I drove into western USA, visiting with friends in Idaho, then Washington and Oregon. The Thomas Paine Meetup Group in Salem Oregon hosted a talk by yours truly.


Crossing back into Canada was a breeze this time, nothing like my Calgary adventure in April when they stole my books. Here was my first article on that, and this was the latest, with a few other articles in between. That battle is not over yet.

Brian Ruhe hosted me to give a talk in Vancouver on the 31st of October, and the title of the resulting video is


Here is the link: (1 hour 21 minutes)

It was very enlightening for me to witness the different response to our predicament from the “normies” and the “red-pill” awakened people. All were extremely respectful and attentive. There were absolutely no problems there, but when it came to arriving at conclusions and recognizing the agenda of white genocide, the response from people who have not YET understood the truth about history and current events shocked me.

Oh well… Everything changes… The sun is going to burn out anyway eventually… We’re all the same… Maybe its our turn…

After decades (or more) of induced insanity through imposed false guilt, lies and deceptions, those people don’t even care about surviving, or about their children and grandchildren surviving. They have no concern about our people surviving. This is almost like a mass suicide wish.

We have work to do! We need to resurrect a love of our culture and our traditions. We need to learn and regain the natural respect for our elders and ancestors. So not only do we need to dispel the lies about our history and our ancestors, we need to learn about all the positive achievements, and the beauty of our rich heritage.

Enough already about the guilt guilt guilt! Most of what we have been made to feel guilty about is false anyway. The imposed guilt feeds into the jewish agenda to destroy our nations.

Learning about the falsehoods is not enough. The “normies” response to learning about the agenda demonstrated to me the urgency in resurrecting knowledge and appreciation of our rich and beautiful cultures.

Prosecutor Appeals: Asking More Jail-time for Alfred Schaefer for Speaking in Court!


If you think it is bizarre that a person can be jailed for the things they say in their defence in court for an alleged speech crime, hold on tight, this will blow your socks off. The Muppet Show continues. Alfred will be back in court on November 12, 2019, to face his inquisitors. Why? The 18 month prison sentence (which is in addition to the 38 months he is already serving) is not enough – according to the prosecution.

Almost one year ago on the 26th of October 2018, the final day of the Schaefer Sibling Trial in Germany, the judge sentenced me (Monika) to 10 months – time served – prison, and my brother Alfred Schaefer to 38 months prison. This was not for theft, vandalism, murder or rape, no, this was for having “wrong-think” about our history. It was for making videos, educating the public about what is really going on in the world, and in my case for an apology to my mother in my “Sorry mom, I was wrong about the holocaust” video. Transcript here.

During the 20 day trial, there were several instances when the judge interrupted Alfred to warn him that the things he was saying could lead to additional charges. Alfred waved those warnings off and said,

You want to lock me up for 6 million years anyway, so I will continue because I am simply speaking truth.

On 8.8. 2019 those additional charges led to the added sentence of 18 months (article here). Both sides are appealing. The prosecutor had asked for 24 months at the time, and is not satisfied with 18 months. If they get their 24 months, the total sentence would be over 5 years. All for speaking peacefully.

Meanwhile there are countless examples of rape and/or assault by “new Germans” which garner far lighter sentences than that, because “they don’t understand our culture” in the words of the judges.

When history comes to you enforced by law, you can count on one thing being for certain: it is a lie. Why else would they legislate a story into existence? Can it get any more brazen than when they make it impossible to make a defence in court, to explain how you have reached your conclusions, or to bring forth evidence which support your conclusions?! How can any thinking person not see the Orwellian tyranny in this? Words elude me.

Through all this, Alfred remains in good spirits. His letters radiate triumph. I know from experience that when you have truth on your side, it is easy to keep your spirits up, and to feel free in heart and mind and soul, even when physically in prison. It also helps immensely to know that we are not alone. Our enemies try their best through their psychological warfare to make us think we are “lone nut-cases”, when nothing is further from the truth.

Just a reminder: letters and postcards are immensely appreciated not only by the political prisoner but also for the authorities to see that the prisoner is not forgotten. Alfred Schaefer’s address: Stadelheimer Str. 12, 81549 Munich, Germany. 

Farewell Love-Letter from Jasper & Update on the “War Zone”

Such a sweet and loving letter was sent to me just days before I moved out of that fairy-tale town called Jasper, that I thought I should share it with you all. I picked up a pile of mail from my post box on my way out, and the return address and name did not even tweak on me at first – it just remained in a small pile with other mail for a few days before I even opened it.

After finally getting around to reading it, well then the little play on words on the envelope dawned on me. Continue reading